|
left
|
|
|
May
2005 Conference Proceedings
Speech
Title
Extensive
Reading Reports - Different intelligences, different
levels of processing.
Address
Marc Helgesen, Miyagi Gakuin Women's University
Profile

Professor
Marc Helgesen, Department of Intercultural Studies, Miyagi Gakuin
Women's University, Sendai, Japan and adjunct, Columbia University
Teachers College MA TESOL Program, Tokyo, Japan.
Marc
is a well-known writer and teacher-trainer Conference speaker. He
is the author of over 100 professional articles, book chapters and
textbooks including the popular English Firsthand series (Longman)
and "Listening" in Practical English Language Teaching,
David Nunan (ed.), (McGraw-Hill). Marc has been a featured speaker
at KOTESOL, JALT, ThaiTESOL and other conferences. He is particularly
interested in language planning, extensive reading and brain-friendly
teaching.
|
|
Extensive
Reading Reports - Different intelligences, different
levels of processing.
Marc Helgesen, Miyagi Gakuin Women's University
Extensive
Reading (ER) is an important aspect of any English as a Foreign/Second
Language reading program. In this paper, I will consider a definition
of ER and benefits of including it in a program. In the main part of
the paper, I will explain four reporting forms that work with different
intelligences and levels of processing.
While there are many variations in ways to implement an ER program,
what they all have in common is that the learners read very large amounts
of material in the target language.
Extensive Reading can be defined as:
Students
reading a lot of easy, enjoyable books (Helgesen, 2005).
Each element
of this definition includes elements which contrast ER with skills-based
methodologies that focus on skimming, scanning, main idea identification
and the like. The first point is that the students spend most of their
time actually reading, not answering comprehension questions, writing
reports or translating. They may do those things, but such tasks are
subordinate to actually reading. The second element is that the students
are reading a lot. Bamford and Day (2004) suggest that, although specific
targets will vary, goals such as "a book a week or 50 pages a week"
are realistic. This is in sharp contrast to traditional reading programs
which had learners reading a single book over a term or a year and doing
a detailed analysis of it. The easy aspect of the definition is important.
Easy books build speed and reading fluency.
Anderson (1999) suggests that 200 words per minute is a useful and realistic
goal for second language readers. To achieve this target, the books
need to be easy. Enjoyable is also a key part of ER. ER is much like
the way people read for pleasure in their native languages. Enjoyable
is, of course, a relative term - it can only be determined by the reader.
For that reason, Day and Bamford (1998) suggest that it is best if the
books are self-selected. There is no assumption that learners are all
reading the same book. Indeed, it would be unusual and perhaps impossible
to find a single title that all members of a class find interesting.
Different learners will prefer mysteries, love stories, biography and
other forms of non-fiction, even comics. In the ER classroom, these
genre preferences are respected. The final element of the definition
is books. While any reading material can be used, graded readers which
present stories with controlled vocabulary and, at times, limited grammar
and information flow are often used.1 These are books that can help
learners become fluent, skilled readers.
In a review of ER research, Day and Bamford identify several benefits
of ER including the following:
* Increased reading ability. This is unsurprising since that
is the stated goal of ER.
* Increased affect and motivation. It should a be noted that
reading is one type of study that can actually be enjoyable as it is
being done. Students are reading books they choose at a level they can
enjoy. This pleasure orientation seems to impact their overall feeling
about learning English.
* Improved vocabulary. Students need to meet vocabulary in context
many times to acquire it. ER seems to be a good way to achieve this.
* Improved listening, speaking and spelling abilities. Interestingly,
even if listening and speaking are not the goals of the class, ER seems
to support these skills, possibly because of the increased exposure
to English vocabulary and discourse.
The rest of this article is available in Hard
Cover version.
|
|
right
|